Written by Catherine Saxelby
on Monday, 27 January 2014.
Tagged: calcium, fat, healthy eating, low fat, milk
The question in full:
Q. I recently read a newspaper article which stated that the body is unable to absorb calcium without the higher fat levels contained in full cream milk. Is it necessary to make a choice between less fat or more calcium?
A. No, it's not necessary. Calcium is absorbed from low-fat and skim milks as well as from full-cream despite the difference in fat content. Numerous studies of people on high-milk diets prove that the calcium gets into the body (it can be detected in the bloodstream within an hour of eating) and then into the bones (bone density increases on the high milk diet). Calcium from supplements is also absorbed without a trace of fat - although not as well as from dairy products.
Calcium is not fat-soluble so there is no reason to believe it requires fat. In milk, it is found in the non-fat portion and remains in the skim milk once the fat is removed to make cream or butter.
Don't miss a post. Sign up for Catherine's eNewsletter and get the latest Foodwatch news, product reviews, recipes and special offers direct to your inbox each month. It's free. Plus you'll receive Catherine's 26-page ebook "Cut the CRRAP - How to limit your intake of ultra-processed foods".
You can unsubscribe at any time and we never give your details to any third party.
Catherine Saxelby has the answers! She is an accredited nutritionist, blogger and award-winning author. Her award-winning book My Nutritionary will help you cut through the jargon. Do you know your MCTs from your LCTs? How about sterols from stanols? What’s the difference between glucose and dextrose? Or probiotics and prebiotics? What additive is number 330? How safe is acesulfame K? If you find yourself confused by food labels, grab your copy of Catherine Saxelby’s comprehensive guide My Nutritionary NOW!
© 2023 Foodwatch Australia. All rights reserved
Author photo by Kate Williams
Website by Joomstore eCommerce