Q. Is Splenda artificial OR made from sugar?

Written by Catherine Saxelby on Monday, 10 February 2014.
Tagged: healthy eating, sugar, sugar substitutes, sweetener

Q.  Is Splenda artificial OR made from sugar?
No video selected.

Q. Can you please tell me about the sweetener Splenda®. I believe it contains some artificial sweetener like maltodextrin, however it is promoted as being made from sugar?

A. Splenda® is the brand name of a number of low-kilojoule sweetening products that contain sucralose.

Sucralose is a sweetener that was approved for use in Australia in 1993. It's made by a process that changes the chemical structure of sugar - three of the hydroxyl ends in a sucrose molecule are replaced with chloride. So it IS made from sugar but it's far from natural.

However Sucralose has been approved as safe by our food regulator and has 600 times the sweetness of sugar but none of its kilojoules (Calories) - perfect for dieters. Its great advantage over other sweeteners is that it doesn't break down with heat so can be used in home baking.

Aside from the sucralose, which is used in tiny quantities, the Splenda sweeteners you'll find in the supermarket contain a variety of filler ingredients depending upon what they are:

  • Splenda granular is a spoon for spoon equivalent for sugar that can be used for cooking. It contains the added starch maltodextrin (not a sweetener) and as a result has a tiny 8 kilojoules (2 Calories) per teaspoon. Really nothing to count
  • Splenda tablets are designed to pop into beverages like coffee or tea. One tablet is equivalent to one teaspoon of sugar and has a negligible 1.3 kJ (0 Cals). The kilojoules come from lactose filler added to bulk out the tablet. This is a common filler in many tablets.
  • Splenda sachets contain two starches maltodextrin and dextrose. One sachet is equivalent to two teaspoons of sugar in sweetness and is 4 kJ (1 Cals). Again next to nothing.

The bottom line

When Splenda is used to sweeten commercial foods (like diet soft drinks), it contributes no kilojoules because there is no need for accompanying starches as with the other forms above. On diet drinks, you'll see it listed under its additive code number 955.

Catherine Saxelby About the author

About the Author


01 944649032


Catherine Saxelby's My Nutritionary

Winner of the Non-Fiction Authors Gold award


Catherine Saxelby has the answers! She is an accredited nutritionist, blogger and award-winning author. Her award-winning book My Nutritionary will help you cut through the jargon. Do you know your MCTs from your LCTs? How about sterols from stanols? What’s the difference between glucose and dextrose? Or probiotics and prebiotics? What additive is number 330? How safe is acesulfame K? If you find yourself confused by food labels, grab your copy of Catherine Saxelby’s comprehensive guide My Nutritionary NOW!